References
Link to the many papers with all the formalism and details (There are 20 years of work in there!):
๐The high-level explanations and results: Nashian game theory is incompatible with quantum physics.
๐The formalism of the underlying model: Games in Minkowski Spacetime
๐The non-Nashian solution for extensive form games with perfect information: Perfect Prediction Equilibrium
๐The non-Nashian solution for normal form games: Perfect Prediction in normal form: Superrational thinking extended to non-symmetric games
๐The non-Nashian solution for all spacetime games: Perfect Prediction in Minkowski Spacetime: Perfectly Transparent Equilibrium for Dynamic Games with Imperfect Information
๐Older paper summarizing the vision: Contingent Free Choice: On Extending Quantum Theory to a Contextual, Deterministic Theory With Improved Predictive Power
Seeding papers by Jean-Pierre Dupuy (it all started with our collaboration in 2004):
๐ J.-P. Dupuy (2000) Philosophical foundations of a new concept of equilibrium in the social sciences: Projected equilibrium
๐ J.-P. Dupuy (1992). Two temporalities, two rationalities: a new look at Newcomb's paradox
Last updated