References

Link to the many papers with all the formalism and details (There are 20 years of work in there!):

👉The high-level explanations and results: Nashian game theory is incompatible with quantum physicsarrow-up-right.

👉The formalism of the underlying model: Games in Minkowski Spacetimearrow-up-right

👉The non-Nashian solution for extensive form games with perfect information: Perfect Prediction Equilibriumarrow-up-right

👉The non-Nashian solution for normal form games: Perfect Prediction in normal form: Superrational thinking extended to non-symmetric gamearrow-up-rightsarrow-up-right

👉The non-Nashian solution for all spacetime games: Perfect Prediction in Minkowski Spacetime: Perfectly Transparent Equilibrium for Dynamic Games with Imperfect Informationarrow-up-right

👉Older paper summarizing the vision: Contingent Free Choice: On Extending Quantum Theory to a Contextual, Deterministic Theory With Improved Predictive Powerarrow-up-right

Seeding papers by Jean-Pierre Dupuy (it all started with our collaboration in 2004):

👉 J.-P. Dupuy (2000) Philosophical foundations of a new concept of equilibrium in the social sciences: Projected equilibriumarrow-up-right

👉 J.-P. Dupuy (1992). Two temporalities, two rationalities: a new look at Newcomb's paradoxarrow-up-right

Last updated